![]() determine the organisational context of their EMS,.From now on, organisations implementing EMAS also have to: They will need to take into account additional elements as part of the environmental review process and when implementing the EMS. TheĪmended annexes were published in August 2017.įollowing the revisions to ISO 14001, EMAS-registered organisations will need to make a few adaptations. Validate your registration with a public authority by applying to your nationalĪs the ISO 14001 standard was revised in 2015, the European Commission and Member States worked together to integrate the new ISO requirements into the Annexes of the EMAS regulation. This report documents your environmental activities and performance and needs to be validated externallyįind innovative and creative ways to involve your employeesĬommit to continuous improvement of your environmental performance Some of the main features that distinguish EMAS from ISO 14001 are:īoost your external communication strategy by annually publishing an environmental report (called ‘environmental statement’). The ISO 14001 standard has been an integral part of EMAS since 2001, and in this way it has allowed many ISO-certified organisations to step up to EMAS through an uncomplicated process. ![]() EMAS is the most credible and robust environmental management tool on the market and goes beyond the requirements of ISO 14001, the international standard for Environmental Management Systems. Major changes should include understanding of the organization’s context in order to better manage risk, emphasis on relevant stakeholders, leadership to promote environmental management, the introduction of the concept of life cycle perspective and a shift towards improving environmental performance. Originality/value: Although 14001:2015 is not yet finished the author thinks organizations will have new tools for environment performance enhancement and the main question is how far ISO/TC 207 can go without alienating the "traditional" user. Social implications: The ISO 14001:2015 revision will have major impacts on the more than 300.000 worldwide certified organizations and on the many professionals that work with, hopefully Practical implications: There will be a 3 year transition process for the ISO 14001:2015 certification and major benefits like Quality Management Systems with less emphasis on documentation and new/reinforced approaches as consideration of organizational context and (relevant) Stakeholders, risk based thinking, life cycle perspective and more emphasis on improving environmental performance. Research limitations/implications: Since the revision standard is not yet finished some changes might still happen and some of the remarks expressed in this paper might not be consensual within the Environmental Community. Purpose: ISO 14001 is an International Standard of worldwide acceptance based on the concept that better environmental performance can be achieved when environmental aspects are systematically identified and managed giving a major contribution to Sustainability, through pollution prevention, improved environmental performance and complying with applicable laws.This paper aims to discuss the Sustainability approach through the use of Environmental Management Standards and the current process of ISO 14001:2015 revision.ĭesign/methodology/approach: Revisiting the concept of Sustainability, the status of the revision process of ISO 14001:2015 and its expected outcomes are discussed.įindings and Originality/value: It is one of the first attempts to analyze, within the Sustainability framework, the status of the revision of the future ISO 14001:2015 International Standard that will respond to the latest trends and is expected to further improve Environmental performance by impacting the work of many People and Organizations worldwide and also ensuring it is compatible with other management system standards such as ISO 9001.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |